IPv4 vs IPv6
Side-by-side comparison, when-to-use-each guide, and instant conversion. Reviewed for 2026.
Legacy systems, many IoT devices, older networking equipment, private network addressing (192.168.x.x).
Modern deployments, all new internet infrastructure, mobile networks (5G native IPv6), cloud providers.
| Aspect | IPv4 | IPv6 |
|---|---|---|
| Address length | 32-bit (4 bytes) | 128-bit (16 bytes) |
| Total addresses | ~4.3 billion | 340 undecillion |
| Example | 192.168.1.1 | 2001:db8::1 |
| Header | Simple, fixed 20 bytes | Extension headers |
| NAT required? | Yes (address exhaustion) | No (abundance) |
Frequently asked
Does it matter whether my connection uses IPv4 or IPv6?
For most users, no. Modern operating systems and browsers handle both seamlessly using 'Happy Eyeballs' — they try IPv6 first, fall back to IPv4. IPv6 is slightly faster on some networks because it avoids NAT translation.
Will IPv4 stop working?
No — the internet will support both protocols for the foreseeable future. IPv4 addresses are traded commercially and are expensive (roughly $40+ per address in 2026). IPv6 is the long-term direction but IPv4 won't be switched off.